The Deadlamb Lifestream http://www.deadlamb.co.uk/lifestream/feed en-us http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Sweetcron demontrout@gmail.com Hollywood must plot a new course to win back its audience http://www.deadlamb.co.uk/lifestream/items/view/2970 Simon Davies

Hollywood must plot a new course to win back its audience - http://www.guardian.co.uk/film...

1 hour ago

from Google Reader

  • Comment
  • Like
]]>
Tue, 07 Sep 2010 12:43:00 +0000 http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/filmblog/2010/sep/07/hollywood-plot-new-course
Demontrout: @DerrenBrown ...like watching Ferris Bueller's Day Off with the mindset that Ferris is a figment of Cameron's imagination! Ace! http://www.deadlamb.co.uk/lifestream/items/view/2967 Tue, 07 Sep 2010 12:31:00 +0000 http://twitter.com/Demontrout/statuses/23232818559 Demontrout: @DerrenBrown Surprise twist didn't matter. Fun was from following the clues and interpreting the interactions under different contexts... http://www.deadlamb.co.uk/lifestream/items/view/2968 Tue, 07 Sep 2010 12:29:00 +0000 http://twitter.com/Demontrout/statuses/23232735583 Demontrout: @DerrenBrown Compelling evidence, but I'm not convinced. How do I know those people even exist and this just isn't a big act? http://www.deadlamb.co.uk/lifestream/items/view/2966 Tue, 07 Sep 2010 12:19:00 +0000 http://twitter.com/Demontrout/statuses/23232090644 Hollywood must plot a new course to win back its audience http://www.deadlamb.co.uk/lifestream/items/view/2969 Alternative media and innovative multi-platform storytelling are set to challenge a complacent film industryAnd so the four-day Labor Day holiday is over and summer comes to an end in Hollywoodland. As the shadows stretch across the manicured lawns of the studio grounds, there will be plenty to think about. The blockbuster season that started in May with the enjoyable hit Iron Man 2 will most likely creep past summer 2009 for a new record. But even if the predictions of Hollywood.com and similar box office analysts are correct and the combined revenues reach $4.4bn (£2.9bn) or thereabouts – beating summer 2009 by around 2.4% – the victory, for that is what it is to the numerically selective advocates of theatrical distribution, will be a hollow one.Summer blockbusters: a decline in standardsThere were good tentpole movies this season, but there were more bad ones and the abiding memory of summer 2010 will be of a decline in standards. It's a bit unfair to brand summer 2010 as the season when popcorn cinema reached new depths of unlikeability because Hollywood's output has contained a lot of rubbish for a long time now. Let's get back to the bit about standards. We're not talking about technical standards: Hollywood's effects gurus can render almost anything believable, so much so that I fear we are at risk of becoming blasé as visual wonders unfold before our eyes. It is the standard of storytelling that is in peril, and audiences aren't being fooled.Box-office revenue v attendanceSay this to a studio executive and they will tell you that moviegoers have spoken. Just look at the box office grosses, they'll cry – the movies have generated more revenues than ever before. But this is a one-ply tissue of an argument, because as we all know, the inevitable march of inflation drives up ticket prices each year and in the case of summer 2010, many chains added surcharges to the cost of a 3D ticket, and there were quite a few of those exchanging hands. The most appropriate indicator we have of audience appreciation for Hollywood content (and I lump independent movies into this overarching label) is attendance. Over the past four months fewer people – 552 million according to projections – will have gone to see movies than they have done in any summer since 1997, when the figure was 540 million.The competition from alternative entertainmentThe threat of alternative entertainment looms large over the film industry. Studio chiefs are anxious to work out how to keep moviegoing relevant and win the hearts and minds of the average teenager. The competition is fierce and grows stronger by the day: video games, Facebook and the internet, graphic novels, and impressive original programming on TV and cable relayed through large-screen TVs. The answer could be more 3D or Imax cinemas, enhanced sound systems, tastier popcorn, or multiplex seats that swivel and shake in time with the movie. Or it could be better movies.Last November when Activision released Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 the video game sold roughly 4.7m copies in North America and the UK on its first day and generated $310m. On its first day. No movie has come close to achieving this on its opening day in a wide launch encompassing say 60-80 countries, and few make this kind of number in their entire box office run. This may partly be down to underdeveloped cinema infrastructures in parts of the world, but I would suggest that mostly it comes down to dull, often repetitive material.The rise of transmediaAnd speaking of video games, studios still don't understand that, by and large, adaptations of their tentpole releases rarely satisfy. Of course some become hits, but simply getting your gaming division to use the same story structure and characters won't work when the story is lacking and competition in the games arena is so high. In this regard it's heartening to see interest in Hollywood coalescing around transmedia. This is the notion that a core intellectual property, say a "bible" or scrapbook of story notes and artist's impressions about a particular milieu or band of characters, can inspire narrative offshoots that do not mimic each other and work across multiple platforms. The game, movie and graphic novel will all explore elements of this world while remaining true to the overarching meta-narrative of the IP. Several companies have sprung up in the past 18 months dedicated to this form of content creation, and a number of established producers are looking at it. Let's see if it catches on with the studios.Better narratives neededThe writing on commercial summer releases needs to improve. Studio development and production teams make themselves look and sound important, but too often the result is juvenile. They get it right sometimes (Iron Man 2, The Karate Kid, Toy Story 3, Inception – how many of those come from original screenplays?) but too often settle for tired storylines, hackneyed dialogue and vacuous characters hiding behind music video sensibilities and loud explosions.It's all cyclical of course. Next summer promises much and may deliver some sparkle, but another creatively impoverished season won't be far behind. Meanwhile, hope springs eternal as we savour the traditionally more challenging fare of autumn and winter. The critics are already raving about Darren Aronofsky's Venice Golden Lion contender Black Swan, while there have been encouraging notices for Sofia Coppola's Somewhere and a promising review in Time magazine of Mark Romanek's Never Let Me Go. There will be more to come in the months ahead, and for now at least, movies could be worth the rising ticket price.North American top 10, 3-6 September 20101. The American, $15.4m. Total: $19.5m2. Machete, $14m3. Takers, $13.5m. Total: $39.9m4. The Last Exorcist, $8.8m. Total: $33.6m5. Going the Distance, $8.6m6. The Expendables, $8.5m. Total: $94.1m7. The Other Guys, $6.7m. Total: $108.1m8. Eat Pray Love, $6.3m. Total: $70.4m9. Inception, $5.9m. Total: $278.4m10. Nanny McPhee Returns, $4.7m. Total: $23.5mFilm industryJeremy Kayguardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

]]>
Tue, 07 Sep 2010 11:32:00 +0000 http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/filmblog/2010/sep/07/hollywood-plot-new-course
Demontrout: that was fun. took the DLR from bow church to Stratford, then national rail to Liverpool St. Walked from there to Chancery Lane. easy! http://www.deadlamb.co.uk/lifestream/items/view/2965 Tue, 07 Sep 2010 09:27:00 +0000 http://twitter.com/Demontrout/statuses/23223086231 Demontrout: Guardian journo told off by Downing St. for distinguishing between DC 'believing' Coulson and 'accepting his position' <a href="http://bit.ly/9vjR1U" rel="external">http://bit.ly/9vjR1U</a> http://www.deadlamb.co.uk/lifestream/items/view/2964 Mon, 06 Sep 2010 13:17:00 +0000 http://twitter.com/Demontrout/statuses/23143770792 Demontrout: Piranha 3D movie review! <a href="http://bit.ly/9QdpfQ" rel="external">http://bit.ly/9QdpfQ</a> http://www.deadlamb.co.uk/lifestream/items/view/2961 Mon, 06 Sep 2010 12:06:00 +0000 http://twitter.com/Demontrout/statuses/23139317105 Demontrout: I should say "directly" involved. It's silly to believe he did not know where these stories were coming from, but he'll get away with it. http://www.deadlamb.co.uk/lifestream/items/view/2962 Mon, 06 Sep 2010 11:49:00 +0000 http://twitter.com/Demontrout/statuses/23138326291 Demontrout: Tbh, can't see satisfying end to hacking case. Feasible they could prove practice was common, but doubt there's proof Coulson was involved http://www.deadlamb.co.uk/lifestream/items/view/2963 Mon, 06 Sep 2010 11:45:00 +0000 http://twitter.com/Demontrout/statuses/23138095526 Demontrout: "Feeling ‘hacked’ off? Let’s ‘tap’ into what makes this government great!" [Memo from A. Coulson] - <a href="http://bit.ly/bkasik" rel="external">http://bit.ly/bkasik</a> http://www.deadlamb.co.uk/lifestream/items/view/2960 Mon, 06 Sep 2010 10:28:00 +0000 http://twitter.com/Demontrout/statuses/23134496893 Feeling ‘hacked’ off? Let’s ‘tap’ into what makes this government great! (Coalition Media Engagement Memo #00122b) http://www.deadlamb.co.uk/lifestream/items/view/2959 Wow! Is it just me or are we doing an absolutely top-notch job at running this country?
Seriously though, let’s take some time to remind ourselves of the excellent progress made by team coalition in just four months. Only one resignation and a very media-friendly baby girl? Go us! Deserving of an extra special mention is our Andy, who’s been doing some fantastic work heading up Dave’s media comms. Just over 120 days into the greatest government ever and, under his careful watch, the only niggles we’ve had to deal with were the Lord Ashcroft affair, a gay scandal involving a senior minister, the BSF fiasco, the Phillip Green appointment, Zac Goldsmith’s election expenses, another gay scandal involving a senior minister, as well as several embarrassing U-turns and verbal gaffes. We all know this could’ve been much, much worse! Read only The Sun every day and you’ll see how brilliantly he’s been keeping the media on message. It’s exactly because of this success why Labour are desperately attempting to smear him. Let’s be clear about this: Andy is a true professional and categorically denies knowing what the reporters directly under his command were doing while he was in charge of approving their articles. Besides, everyone knows all the other newspapers are also doing it and it’s not really like it’s actual hacking anyway. The important thing to remember is that Andy has already been through the rigours of a Select Committee investigation in which he absolved himself of all responsibility. The important thing to forget is that the Committee concluded their report by criticising Andy and the rest of News International for concealing the truth about what really occurred. We say, let’s leave this story in the past where it belongs. Is it really ‘news’ to revisit a four year old scandal? Of course not. That would be more like ‘olds’. Nobody’s interested in olds. And isn’t this government all about the ‘new’ politics? This is why Dave is standing by Andy and so should we all (the great thing about all these scandals is that it really gives Dave a chance to pat each of us on the back, am I right!?). The only past record we need to concern ourselves with is that of the previous Labour government, which was lousy for civil liberties and so can never be trusted ever again. Thanks everyone. And remember, always stay on message whether in public or in private. After all, you never know who’s listening! Sincerely, A. Coulson

Related posts:I suffer from social media schizophrenia Nick Clegg’s Letter to Justin Sane (from a kinder, gentler liberal conservative) “I want to vote for a party that makes decisions based on what I reckon, not on what works”

]]>
Sun, 05 Sep 2010 23:04:00 +0000 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/deadlamb-theblog/~3/O1KwHqMsHyc/
Demontrout: How is Gove's latest bright idea any different in substance to the current system? <a href="http://bit.ly/aN7Eol" rel="external">http://bit.ly/aN7Eol</a> #stopfuckingwithourschools http://www.deadlamb.co.uk/lifestream/items/view/2958 Sun, 05 Sep 2010 11:46:00 +0000 http://twitter.com/Demontrout/statuses/23052503281 Demontrout: I do not understand Michael Gove's baccalaureate idea. Are many kids currently doing fewer than 5 GCSEs?? http://www.deadlamb.co.uk/lifestream/items/view/2957 Sun, 05 Sep 2010 09:02:00 +0000 http://twitter.com/Demontrout/statuses/23045403211 Gandalf has never looked so good. http://www.deadlamb.co.uk/lifestream/items/view/2956 Simon Davies

Gandalf has never looked so good. - http://www.myextralife.com/sitenew...

1 hour ago

from Google Reader

  • Comment
  • Like
]]>
Sun, 05 Sep 2010 02:39:00 +0000 http://www.myextralife.com/sitenews/gandalf-has-never-looked-so-good/
Demontrout: Did Tony Blair suggest he would support declaring war on Iran last night!? http://www.deadlamb.co.uk/lifestream/items/view/2953 Sat, 04 Sep 2010 21:58:00 +0000 http://twitter.com/Demontrout/statuses/23007808433 Photo http://www.deadlamb.co.uk/lifestream/items/view/2955 Sat, 04 Sep 2010 20:52:00 +0000 http://deadlamb.tumblr.com/post/1065822725 Piranha 3D: the closest you’ll get to sticking your face between Kelly Brook’s boobs in real life [movie review] http://www.deadlamb.co.uk/lifestream/items/view/2952 ****This review contains spoilers**** Piranha 3D is a rare movie experience. It’s a stupid movie made for stupid people, but at only 1hr 30mins long I was surprised to find it end long before I expected or really wanted it to. It’s main redeeming feature is that stuff happens at such a relentless pace you aren’t given time to get bored or question things too much. Strangely, the only scene that seemed to drag is a 4-5 minute butt-naked swimming scene with Kelly Brook and pornstar Riley Steele.

It’s formulaic, but you’re constantly kept guessing as to which particular formula its playing around with at the time. The problem with formulaic movies is that they’re predictable. Whether by design or accident, Piranha 3D sidesteps this pitfall by energetically jumping from cliche to cliche. It picks something up and then seems to drop it later down the line, then leads you somewhere else only to return later to that thing you’ve already half-forgotten. It’s like some hot girl seducing you into walking down a back alley where she mugs you, only to return half your money later that evening and flash her tits at you. On the whole, you wouldn’t say it was the greatest experience, but it was certainly interesting and you’re not too worse off at the end of it. This doesn’t sound great but it seems to work for Piranha 3D, mainly because of the refreshingly short runtime. Though the shocking ending does help almost magically alleviate many of the faults in the plot by simply not attempting to resolve anything. The Harry Potter movies could learn a lot from Piranha 3D. If you’re watching the Potter movies for the story, you should really learn how to read. Targeted at kids, the makers of the Harry Potter movies would probably be better off if they forgot most of the plot and simply tried to cram only the most entertaining bits from each book into one and a half hour instalments. I don’t think many kids would mind if they skipped the tedious exploration of Professor Lupin’s angsty existence and just had a fucking scary werewolf kicking ass. They could also end at the most exciting part of the beginning of the next book, thus avoiding the lame endings; wrapping everything up is pointless when you know the same shit will just kick off next time around. What’s good about it: The very best thing about Piranha 3D is that you go to the cinema thinking it’s a cheesy horror about killer prehistoric fish with a cameo from Kelly Brook’s chest, only to discover it’s actually just a movie about boobs. I love Jerry O’Connell and his disastrous career choices. While the transition to three dimensions was restricted to the fish and not the characters (hohoho), O’Connell’s performance as a sleazy porn director was, at least, energetic. His character seemed to be the only one who actually enjoyed life.

The gore is pretty ace. The cheeky opener starring Richard Dreyfuss mumbling along to “show me the way to go home”. Riley Steele motorboats Kelly Brook. Brbrbrbrbrbr.

What’s bad about it: Absolutely pointless 3D effects. Possibly the stupidest thing about this movie occurred within the first 30 seconds and summed up all that’s wrong with most 3D movies. The FX guys clearly forgot how perspective works and attempted to apply a ropey 3D style to the distant mountains. The cardboard backdrops in Wizard of Oz were more convincing. As my eyes struggled to adapt to this abnormal way of viewing a landscape any hope for an immersive experience was instantly shattered. I was having a piss when they explained the origin of the killer piranhas. But, from the movie poster, I gather 200 million years of evolution created the perfect killing machine? I’m no expert in evolution, but wouldn’t the result of spending 200 million years in the chilly depths of a sealed cave with no source of food be more likely to produce virtually blind, slow-moving, physically retarded, albino fish with an aversion to light? I suppose this is nitpicking, but I honestly believe the film wouldn’t have suffered if Christopher Lloyd had said “I have no fucking idea how these things exist! It doesn’t make sense!”. I don’t understand why screenwriters think these dubious, pseudo-scientific justifications for fantastic creatures need to be included. At best these explanations are merely confusing and at worst they are so clearly ridiculous they shatter any suspension of disbelief you were desperately clinging to.

Most of what happens is stupid and doesn’t make much sense. Like I said, this isn’t a huge problem because some nice boobs are never too far away to distract you. But if you don’t like boobs or get hung up on this type of thing you will find a lot of the plot and character work intolerable. Here’s a few examples: The main protagonist fits the mold of a typically down-on-his-luck everyman, guiding us through extraordinary circumstances until he saves the day and gets the girl. However, he spends most of the time outside the main scope of events being really boring. Two kids (two of only a handful of characters whom I genuinely cared about whether they lived or died) are stranded on a small island surrounded by water filled with flesh-eating super-piranha. We are teased with their peril when the girl cuts her foot in the water and, unwittingly, narrowly avoids being nipped by one of the fishes. We kind of forget about them, however, until later when our protagonist spots them on the island and has the boat move closer for a potentially dramatic rescue. Worryingly, it’s a big boat in shallow water and the kids must go waist-deep into the water to reach it. The audience grows tense as the adorable innocents enter the water… and then casually board the boat without anything happening. They spend the rest of the movie comfortably avoiding any real danger. The main guy’s love interest starts the movie with an arsehole for a boyfriend. This always annoys me as it instantly establishes her as a dickhead and makes you assume the main guy must also be dickhead for loving her. She further cements this opinion when she ditches the arsehole boyfriend because he lied about having backstage passes (note: she was happy to stay with the arsehole boyfriend when he and his best mate were acting like cunts towards our protagonist). There is not a single scene in this movie in which she isn’t being a dick. Love interest is trapped in the cabin of the rapidly sinking yacht fending off piranha with a frying pan while the protagonist desperately tries to rescue her through a skylight which is, despairingly, too narrow and out of her reach. Our hero does the only thing he can do: call his mum. The movie then completely changes pace, another couple of challenges are thrown in to distract us from the main event and, minutes later, the mum arrives to rescue our hero. After a few more minutes of pointless dialogue, you find yourself wondering if the love interest has already been eaten in a deleted scene. Eventually, our hero finds the right time to mention her plight. Ving Rhames, phoning in a “too old for this shit” cop, sacrifices himself for no good reason using an outboard motor to ineffectually chop up seemingly suicidal fishes. As he gets torn apart by a swarm of ravenous piranha the film cuts to a shot of another cop looking absolutely distraught. Who is this distraught cop? Have we seen him previously in the movie? Were they lovers? You know a director’s struggling when they need to use another actor to show the audience what emotion they should be experiencing.

The cops, led by the sheriff, hero’s mum (Elisabeth Shue), and her deputy (Ving Rhames) are utterly useless when the piranha attack. Scores of college kids on spring break are gruesomely killed because of their incompetence. Their advance knowledge of the threat saves no-one. They may as well have not even been there. The yacht carrying our hero, the love interest, Jerry O’Connell, Kelly Brook, Riley Steele and the kids has its propellor caught in some sea weed (or something). A coked-up O’Connell freaks out, aggressively gunning the engine in an attempt to free them. This would be the perfect moment for our hero to develop as a character and assert himself by challenging the bullying O’Connell over control of the ship. Instead, he hovers around the periphery, whining that carrying on like that will break the engine. O’Connell carries on like that and the engine doesn’t break. The hero saves the girl using the dead body of O’Connell to distract the piranha and swim into the sunken cabin. We know this wouldn’t work. During the attack on the college kids, the piranha were munching on anything and everything in the water. There was never any suggestion that the pack concentrates on one feast at a time. Even if there was, the hero would not have witnessed it. Nor does he know how many piranha are under the boat. The plan is the equivalent of pouring a bucket of chum into a mass of sharks during a feeding frenzy, moments before jumping in for a swim. Kelly Brook’s character has a weird Gandalf-ish quality. I didn’t get it. What I would do differently: Here’s the thing: there’s very little I would change about this movie. Even fixing some of the issues I’ve described above would add too much complexity and detract from the film’s entertainment value. However, as I’ve already said, I wouldn’t give an explanation for the piranha’s existence. I would definitely recast the love interest and give her more of a personality (as unfashionable as that may in Hollywood). I’d also want to see more of Carlos from Desperate Housewives and Dizzy from Starship Troopers. Despite only a fleeting appearance, they had good chemistry together and brought the total number of characters who I gave even the slightest hint of a shit about up to a grand total of 5. Recommendation: If you ever watched MTV’s spring break show and found yourself hoping the sexy college girl with nice rack would get her face torn off by a motorboat propellor, this movie is for you. For everyone else, I recommend Mr Holland’s Opus, possibly the best Richard Dreyfuss film ever (better than Jaws? Perhaps…). It’s great.

Related posts:Jennifer’s Body review – Amanda Seyfried rules, Megan Fox drools (blood, that is) Is James Delingpole for real? Is James Delingpole for real?

]]>
Sat, 04 Sep 2010 17:35:00 +0000 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/deadlamb-theblog/~3/UFEbwUN2jMo/
Photo http://www.deadlamb.co.uk/lifestream/items/view/2950 Sat, 04 Sep 2010 01:05:00 +0000 http://deadlamb.tumblr.com/post/1061210799 Photo http://www.deadlamb.co.uk/lifestream/items/view/2951 Sat, 04 Sep 2010 00:43:00 +0000 http://deadlamb.tumblr.com/post/1061116017